Secured creditor priority over State tax charge under central recovery laws prevails against State first charge.

After insertion of Section 31-B in the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 and Section 26E in the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, secured creditors are given priority over other debts, including governmental dues. The statutory scheme, supported by overriding clauses in the central enactments, displaces the earlier position that allowed a State tax first charge to prevail in the absence of such provisions. In this context, the Himachal Pradesh VAT Act, 2005 cannot override the central recovery statutes where both operate in the same field. The secured creditor's claim therefore prevails over the State's tax charge.

---

---

Issues: Whether the secured creditor's right to realise secured debt under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 and the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 has priority over the State's first charge for tax dues under Section 26 of the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

Analysis: The statutory scheme after insertion of Section 31-B in the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 and Section 26E in the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 gives priority to secured creditors over all other debts and governmental dues. The Court held that the earlier rule applied in the absence of such central provisions, but the legal position changed after the amendments. Since the central enactments are special enactments with overriding clauses, and the State VAT provision is a State law creating first charge, any inconsistency must be resolved in favour of the Central statutes in view of the constitutional principles governing repugnancy and legislative supremacy in the relevant field.

Conclusion: The secured creditor's claim has priority over the State's tax charge, and the State's first charge does not prevail in the present facts.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the Central recovery statutes confer priority on secured creditors and contain overriding provisions, such priority prevails over a State law creating a first charge for tax dues.

---