Non-resident assessee wins capital gains case on property sale brokerage expenses and valuation disputes

ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of a non-resident assessee in a capital gains case involving property sale. The tribunal directed AO to verify and allow brokerage expenses totaling Rs. 20,28,125 if substantiated. For fair market value determination of rear basement, ITAT held that DRP wrongly disregarded registered valuer's report in favor of circle rates, noting sufficient evidence showed property acquisition before 01.04.2001 through agreement and rental receipts. The tribunal also directed AO to include Rs. 17 lakhs stamp duty in acquisition cost calculation, reversing DRP directions and deciding grounds 4-7 in assessee's favor.

---

---

Issues involved:
The appeal involves issues regarding the assessment order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle, International Taxation for Assessment Year 2019-20. The key issues raised by the Assessee in the appeal include the validity of notices issued, application of provisions under section 144C, limitation of the assessment order, rejection of valuation report, adoption of circle rates, addition of income from Long Term Capital Gain, consideration of documents, and initiation of penalty under section 270A of the Act.

Validity of Notices and Assessment Order:
The Assessee challenged the notice issued under section 143(2) of the Act, arguing that it was beyond the prescribed time limit, rendering it void ab initio. The Assessee also contended that the assessment order was barred by limitation. However, these grounds were not pressed during the hearing.

Rejection of Valuation Report and Adoption of Circle Rates:
The Assessee submitted a valuation report for two properties sold, disputing the rejection of the report by the AO. The Assessee argued against the adoption of circle rates for indexation of the properties, claiming that the properties were acquired before 2001. The Tribunal found in favor of the Assessee, directing that the indexed cost of the properties should be considered based on the valuation report provided.

Disallowed Brokerage Expenses and Stamp Duty Consideration:
The AO disallowed brokerage expenses claimed by the Assessee, citing discrepancies in the invoice. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify the brokerage expenses and allow them if found verified. Additionally, the stamp duty paid by the Assessee for the purchase of a property was not considered in the cost of acquisition by the AO. The Tribunal instructed the AO to include the stamp duty amount in the cost of acquisition for the property.

Decision and Conclusion:
The Tribunal found in favor of the Assessee on the grounds related to the rejection of the valuation report, adoption of circle rates, disallowed brokerage expenses, and consideration of stamp duty. The appeal of the Assessee was allowed with consequential effects to follow as per the directions provided. The order was pronounced in the open court on 26.02.2024.

---