Challenge to CGST Authority Order Rejected: Statutory Appeal Mechanism Preferred Over Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

HC dismissed writ petition challenging CGST Authority order, finding alternative statutory remedy exists. Petitioners failed to demonstrate jurisdictional defect or procedural impropriety. Court declined constitutional writ jurisdiction under Article 226, emphasizing statutory appeal mechanisms as appropriate recourse for challenging administrative order.

---

---

The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order passed by the CGST Authority, stating that the order is appealable under the statute and there is an alternative remedy available. The petitioners did not show lack of jurisdiction, denial of hearing, or violation of specific provisions of law. The court declined to use constitutional writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. (Case citation: 2024 (3) TMI 1167 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT)

---