1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>India's SC Dismisses Petition After 608-Day Filing Delay, Leaves Legal Question Open for Future Review.</h1> The SC of India dismissed a special leave petition due to a substantial delay of 608 days in its filing. The application for condonation of delay was also ... Delay in filling appeal before SC - Deduction u/s 80-IA - Nature of Interest income - Advances extended to Employees - interest on the bonds issued by GRIDCO in lieu of unpaid energy bills - Nexus with business activity - Disallowing deduction towards βpower profitβ under Section 80-IA (4)(iv) - As decided by HC [2022 (3) TMI 539 - ORISSA HIGH COURT] on the netting principle, since there is no other activity of the Assessee except power generation, the AO, the CIT(A) and the ITAT, were in error in disallowing the aforementioned sum as deduction under 80-IA of the IT Act. There is merit in the contention of the Assessee that the interest received from the bonds issued by GRIDCO have a direct nexus with its essential business activity and therefore, was income derived from it, thus, making it eligible for such deduction HELD THAT:- There is a gross delay of 608 days in filing the special leave petition. The reasons assigned for seeking condonation of delay are not acceptable to us. Hence, the application seeking condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently, the special leave petition is dismissed on the ground of delay keeping open the question of law, if any, which arises in this matter. The Supreme Court of India dismissed a special leave petition due to a gross delay of 608 days in filing it. The application seeking condonation of delay was also dismissed. The court kept open the question of law arising in the matter.