Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether unutilised credit of additional excise duty on textiles and textile articles was refundable on export of finished goods, and whether the departmental circulars clarifying refund of such credit applied to pending matters.
Analysis: Rule 57A and Rule 57F of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 governed the MODVAT credit scheme and permitted utilisation of specified duty credit for payment of duty on final products and, where adjustment was not possible in export situations, refund subject to notification-based safeguards. The relevant notification restricted utilisation of credit of additional duty on textiles and textile articles, but the Board's Circular No. 701/17/2003-CX. dated 12-3-2003 clarified that refund of unutilised AED (GSI) credit would be allowed even where the finished product was not liable to that duty, and that pending cases should be decided accordingly. A subsequent circular extended that clarification to AED (T&TA). The circulars were treated as beneficial and clarificatory in nature, and therefore applicable to pending cases. The departmental objection that the later clarification could not operate retrospectively was rejected.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to refund of unutilised credit of AED (T&TA), and the Revenue's challenge failed.