Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether white lead was correctly classifiable under Heading 2805.90 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and, after the tariff amendment on 10-2-1987, under Heading 2836.90, instead of Heading 2804.60.
Analysis: White lead was described as a basic lead carbonate and, therefore, as an inorganic salt of a metal. Since it was not specifically described elsewhere, it fell under Heading 28.05 as salts and peroxysalts of inorganic acids and metals, more specifically under sub-heading 2805.90. The earlier practice under the repealed tariff did not control classification under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. After the tariff changes on 10-2-1987, white lead remained classifiable under Heading 28.36 as a carbonate not otherwise specified, under sub-heading 2836.90. Heading 2804.60 was inapplicable because lead carbonate is neither lead oxide nor red lead nor orange lead.
Conclusion: The classification under Heading 2804.60 was ? No, must be neutral. The correct classification was under Heading 2805.90 prior to 10-2-1987 and under Heading 2836.90 thereafter, against the assessee and in favour of Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A tariff item must be classified according to its chemical and descriptive identity under the relevant tariff schedule, and a residual heading applies only when the goods are not more specifically covered elsewhere.