Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bodies built on motor vehicle chassis by the appellants were classifiable under Tariff Heading 87.07 and, if so, whether the benefit of Notification No. 175/86 dated 1-3-1986 was available.
Analysis: The issue was held to be squarely covered by the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had ruled that such bodies are classifiable under Tariff Heading 87.07 and not under Tariff Headings 87.02 or 87.04. The departmental reliance on Notification No. 248/87 dated 4-11-1987 issued under Section 11C of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was rejected as an unsafe basis to infer a contrary classification. Following the High Court ruling, the appellants' goods were treated as falling under Tariff Heading 87.07, with the consequence that the exemption under Notification No. 175/86 would apply if otherwise available.
Conclusion: The classification was held to be under Tariff Heading 87.07, and the appellants were held entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 175/86 if otherwise applicable.