Distinct commercial identity in classification: processed timber flanges fall under the residuary tariff, not intermediate block boards.

Review under section 36(2) was held time-barred insofar as it sought to disturb the duty demand, so the challenge on that aspect failed. On classification, veneer faced timber flanges cut to round shape and punched with a central hole were found to acquire a distinct commercial identity, name, character and use as timber drum flanges. They were therefore not classifiable as veneered block boards under tariff item 16-B(ii) and correctly fell under the residuary tariff item 68. The appellate classification was sustained, and relief followed from the limitation finding on the demand portion.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the review notice under section 36(2) was barred by time insofar as it related to the duty demand. (ii) Whether veneer faced timber flanges, after being cut to round shape and punched with a central hole, remained classifiable as veneered block boards under tariff item 16-B(ii) or fell under tariff item 68.

Issue (i): Whether the review notice under section 36(2) was barred by time insofar as it related to the duty demand.

Analysis: The order under review was dated 9-4-1981 and the notice under section 36(2) was issued on 28-1-1982. On the facts, the challenge to the finding that the demand was time-barred could not be sustained, and the notice could not survive to that extent in view of the statutory limitation governing review.

Conclusion: The notice was barred by time insofar as it related to the duty demand, and the Revenue's challenge on that aspect failed.

Issue (ii): Whether veneer faced timber flanges, after being cut to round shape and punched with a central hole, remained classifiable as veneered block boards under tariff item 16-B(ii) or fell under tariff item 68.

Analysis: The goods were manufactured from veneered block boards, but after being cut into a round flange and punched in the centre they acquired a distinct name, character and use. The product was known in the trade as timber drum flanges with veneer faced inside, indicating a separate commercial identity. Once the article emerged as a different product, it could no longer be treated as the same veneered block board for tariff item 16-B(ii) purposes, and since it did not fit items 1 to 67 it appropriately fell under the residuary entry.

Conclusion: The goods were not classifiable under tariff item 16-B(ii) and were correctly classified under tariff item 68.

Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the appellate authority was sustained, and the challenge to the demand portion also failed as time-barred, leaving the assessee entitled to relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Where processing results in a product acquiring a distinct commercial identity, name, character and use, it is classifiable according to the new article and not as the intermediate material from which it was made; a review challenge beyond limitation cannot disturb the time-bar finding.

---