Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether fents of cotton fabrics were covered by the general exemption under Notification No. 127/69-C.Ex. or only by the specific duty notification under Notification No. 72/69-C.Ex., and whether the assessee could claim the more beneficial notification.
Analysis: Notification No. 72/69-C.Ex. specifically prescribed rates of duty for fents of cotton fabrics, while Notification No. 127/69-C.Ex. granted a general exemption for cotton fabrics and blankets within a value limit measured per square metre. The question was whether the two notifications were mutually exclusive or whether both could apply to fents. The majority held that where the goods are fents, the notification specially dealing with fents is the applicable one, and the general cotton fabrics notification could not displace it. The dissenting view was that fents are also cotton fabrics, the two notifications were not mutually exclusive, and the assessee could claim assessment under the more beneficial notification if the value per square metre was established.
Conclusion: The majority held that Notification No. 72/69-C.Ex. applied to the goods and the appeal was rejected, while the dissent would have allowed the assessee to seek assessment under Notification No. 127/69-C.Ex. on proof of value.