Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the legend "Bengal Chemicals" printed on pilfer-proof caps of medicines specified in the pharmacopoeia constituted a brand name or mark indicating a trade connection so as to make the goods classifiable as patent or proprietary medicines under Item 14E of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.
Analysis: The definition of patent or proprietary medicines under Item 14E has two distinct limbs: medicines bearing a name not specified in a pharmacopoeia, and medicines bearing a brand name or registered trade mark used to indicate a trade connection between the medicine and a person entitled to use that mark. Medicines whose names are specified in a pharmacopoeia fall outside the first limb. On the facts, the legend "Bengal Chemicals" was used generally to show the manufacturer's name and not as a distinctive mark for the medicines themselves. The absence of any special design, logo, or other indicia of proprietary interest meant that the mark did not satisfy the second limb either.
Conclusion: The medicines were not patent or proprietary medicines under Item 14E, and the demand was not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The revenue's challenge failed and the order setting aside the duty demand was affirmed.
Ratio Decidendi: A manufacturer's name or general trade mark, without more, does not attract Item 14E unless it is used on the medicine or its container to indicate a proprietary trade connection in the goods themselves.