Excise duty on goods rendered unfit during in-factory testing was excluded under Rule 49's unfit-for-marketing proviso.

Excise duty was discussed in relation to goods taken within the factory for testing and rendered unfit in the process. The analysis states that, although duty under Rule 49 is generally payable on removal from the factory, the goods here were not cleared out of the factory and had become unfit for use and marketing during testing. On that factual basis, the second proviso to Rule 49 was said to apply, allowing the proper officer to decline duty where goods are claimed as unfit for consumption or marketing, subject to conditions imposed by the Collector. The text concludes that no duty was payable on the poles and the department's appeal failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether excise duty was payable on goods removed within the factory for testing and rendered unfit for use in the testing process, and whether such goods could be excluded from the clearance value for exemption purposes.

Analysis: Excise is a tax on manufacture, but under Rule 49 duty becomes payable at the time of removal from the factory. The goods in question were not cleared out of the factory; they were taken for testing within the factory and became unusable in the process. The second proviso to Rule 49 empowers the proper officer not to demand duty on goods claimed by the manufacturer as unfit for consumption or marketing, subject to conditions imposed by the Collector. Since the goods had admittedly become unfit for use and therefore unfit for marketing, and no contrary controversy was raised on that factual aspect, the benefit of the proviso was available.

Conclusion: No duty was payable on the poles rendered unfit during testing within the factory, and the appeal by the department failed.

---