Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods Dutrex RT were correctly classifiable for the purpose of additional duty under Item 10 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, or under Tariff Item 11A.
Analysis: The first ground relating to liability to additional duty was not pressed. On the surviving issue, the Tribunal followed its earlier decisions on the same product and accepted the view that the goods fell within Item 10. The revenue classification under Tariff Item 11A was rejected in light of the binding precedents relied upon by the parties and the consistent approach already taken by the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The goods Dutrex RT were liable to be assessed under Item 10 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and not under Tariff Item 11A. The classification favoured the assessee.