Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Incoloy 800 tubes required as spares for a reformed gas boiler were classifiable under Item 73.17/19(2), Item 73.17/19(1)(iii), or Item 84.01/02 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Analysis: It was held in an earlier decision relied upon here that Incoloy 800 is not stainless steel. On that basis, the goods could not fall under the stainless steel sub-heading in Item 73.17/19(2). Since Item 73.17/19(1)(iii) specifically covered tubes and pipes for boilers falling within Heading 84.01/02, that specific entry governed the classification and excluded resort to Item 84.01/02.
Conclusion: The goods were classifiable under Item 73.17/19(1)(iii) and not under Item 73.17/19(2) or Item 84.01/02.
Final Conclusion: The classification was corrected in favour of the revenue, with the duty liability fixed under the more specific tariff entry.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tariff item specifically covers the goods in question, classification must be made under that specific entry and not under a more general or residuary entry; goods not being stainless steel cannot be classified under the stainless steel sub-heading.