Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether zinc ash imported prior to 1981 was correctly classifiable under Tariff Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff, and whether the appellant was entitled to refund and consequential exemption benefits.
Analysis: The parties accepted that the earlier Tribunal decision governing zinc ash imports prior to 1981 applied to the present dispute. On that basis, zinc ash was required to be classified under Tariff Item 68 and not under Tariff Item 26B. Once the classification under Tariff Item 68 was accepted, the duty liability had to be recomputed accordingly, and any exemption notification applicable to the goods was to be extended subject to fulfilment of its conditions.
Conclusion: The classification under Tariff Item 68 was accepted in favour of the appellant, the contrary classification was disapproved, and refund admissible to the appellant was directed to be granted.