Separate industrial units for excise exemption were upheld where records showed distinct operations, registrations and premises.

CEGAT held that two concerns could be treated as separate industrial units for Notification No. 176/77-C.E. where the record showed separate partnership deeds, registrations, excise licences and a rental arrangement, and the utensils division operated from a separate building manufacturing a different line of goods. Common partners and earlier composite correspondence did not, by themselves, change the legal character of the units. For exemption purposes, the relevant plant and machinery had to be examined with reference to the unit manufacturing the notified goods. The utensils division was therefore entitled to the exemption, and clubbing of the two units for valuation failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether Swastika Metal Works and Swastika Metal Works (Utensils Division) constituted one industrial unit or two separate industrial units for the purpose of exemption under Notification No. 176/77-C.E., and whether the value of plant and machinery in the two concerns had to be clubbed.

Analysis: The exemption under Notification No. 176/77-C.E. applied to goods manufactured in an industrial unit where the capital investment on plant and machinery did not exceed the prescribed limit. The record showed separate partnership deeds, separate registrations, separate excise licences, and a rental arrangement between the two concerns. The utensils division manufactured a different line of goods in a separate and independent building. The mere fact that some partners were common or that earlier correspondence treated the concerns as composite did not determine the legal character of the units for the notification. On the interpretation of the expression "industrial unit", the relevant plant and machinery had to be examined with reference to the unit in which the notified goods were manufactured.

Conclusion: The two concerns were separate industrial units, and only the plant and machinery of the utensils division was to be considered. The utensils division remained eligible for the exemption, and the demand based on clubbing of the two units failed.

---