Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the aqueous solution of phenol formaldehyde manufactured by the appellants, containing less than 45% solid resin, fell under Tariff Item 15A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.
Analysis: The product was an aqueous solution with resin content below 45% and was treated as an intermediary product rather than a finished synthetic resin. The prior decision of the Delhi High Court had already held that such a solution could not be regarded as artificial or synthetic resin in liquid form and, therefore, did not answer Tariff Item 15A.
Conclusion: The product did not fall under Tariff Item 15A.
Ratio Decidendi: An aqueous solution containing less than 45% solid resin is not classifiable as artificial or synthetic resin under Tariff Item 15A.