Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported tyres for scrapers were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 35/79-Cus. and the subsequent Notification No. 129-Cus/80, and whether the appellants had complied with the notification conditions.
Analysis: The imported tyres were found to be original equipment for initial assembly of scrapers. The earlier notification was treated as covering the goods, and the later notification was regarded as clarificatory of the earlier exemption. The appellants had produced the DGTD certificate and executed the bond required under the notification, showing compliance with the prescribed conditions.
Conclusion: The exemption benefit was held admissible, and the impugned order was set aside in favour of the appellants.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded and the customs exemption was granted with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: A later customs notification may be treated as clarificatory of an earlier exemption notification, and where the importer satisfies the prescribed conditions, exemption cannot be denied merely because the imported goods are not expressly named in the notification.