Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported machine was entitled to the benefit of Sl. No. 19 of Notification No. 41/78-Customs as a "Collar Turning and Blocking Machine".
Analysis: The machine was examined on its actual working and on the basis of the catalogue and was found to perform fusing operations, namely loading, heat pressing and cooling, rather than the distinct function of collar turning and blocking. The material on record showed that collar turning required a different operation, and the respondents produced no evidence to establish that the imported machine could perform that function. The request for a broad construction of the exemption entry was therefore not able.
Conclusion: The machine did not fall within Sl. No. 19 of Notification No. 41/78-Customs, and the refund claim was not admissible.