Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported machinery was entitled to the benefit of Project Imports under Heading 84.66.
Analysis: The machinery was acquired for modernisation of the existing plant and was neither for initial setting up nor for expansion. On that basis, the claim for Project Imports failed. The earlier Tribunal view relied upon by the parties was followed, and the position regarding classification under Heading 84.37(2) was treated as not in dispute.
Conclusion: The benefit of Project Imports was not available to the importer, and the claim was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Machinery acquired for modernisation of an existing plant, and not for initial setting up or expansion, does not qualify for Project Import benefit.