Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported conveyor belts were classifiable under Heading 84.22 as machinery parts for industrial furnaces, or were excluded from that heading and classifiable under Heading 73.33/40.
Analysis: The goods were described as conveyor belts and not as chains, so classification as chains under Heading 73.29 was not appropriate. Note 1(h) to Section XV excludes endless belts of metal wire or strip from Chapter 84. On that basis, the imported goods, being conveyor belts made of iron or steel, fell outside the scope of Section XVI and could not be treated as conveyor belts under Heading 84.22. They were therefore classifiable only under the metal-heading adopted by Customs.
Conclusion: The claim for re-classification under Heading 84.22 failed and the classification under Heading 73.33/40 was sustained, against the assessee.