Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported semi-finished steel strips were classifiable as knives and cutting blades under Heading 82.06 by applying Interpretative Rule 2(a), or whether they remained raw material/unfinished goods assessable under a different tariff heading.
Analysis: The invoice and bill of entry described the goods as semi-finished cold rolled, cold drawn carbon steel strip in carburised form, in spiral coil form, intended for the manufacture of blades/knives. The record also showed that several further manufacturing operations were still required to convert the goods into knives. On that basis, the goods were found to be far from the stage of finished industrial knives or blades and had not acquired the essential characteristics of the final product. The Tribunal also held that the subsequent assertions made before the lower authority could not be treated as proof that the goods had already attained the character of knives, and the cited precedent on Rule 2(a) was therefore inapplicable.
Conclusion: Interpretative Rule 2(a) was not applicable, and the claim for classification under Heading 82.06 failed.