Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's wife's social and constructive work amounted to an occupation within the meaning of section 5(a) of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957, so as to exempt the expenditure incurred for attending meetings of social welfare institutions.
Analysis: Section 5(a) exempts expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of a business, profession, vocation or occupation carried on by the assessee. The absence of a profit-making motive does not prevent an activity from being a vocation or occupation. The expression "occupation" is of wider import than "vocation" and covers an activity which occupies time and attention and is carried on with some continuity or regularity, and is not merely momentary, isolated, or a casual pursuit. The findings showed that the assessee's wife was associated in various capacities with numerous social welfare institutions and was devoting her time and attention continuously to social and constructive work.
Conclusion: The activity was an occupation within section 5(a), and the Tribunal was justified in allowing the exemption.
Ratio Decidendi: An activity may constitute an occupation for the purpose of section 5(a) even without a profit-making motive, if it is a continuous and regular pursuit that occupies a person's time and attention.