Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether depreciation and repairs expenditure in respect of all the buildings used for employees engaged in planting were allowable even though some of those buildings did not actually yield rent.
Analysis: The deductions claimed fell within section 5 of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950. The fact that the plantations had not yet begun to yield income did not, by itself, defeat the statutory allowances. The computation provisions, read with the loss-carry-forward scheme, showed that expenditure laid out wholly for the purposes of deriving agricultural income could be allowed even where there was no income in the relevant year. The same principle applied to repairs and depreciation for buildings required for the agricultural activity.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to claim depreciation and repairs on all the buildings, not merely those from which rent was actually realised, and the question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.