Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported DZM-180 mosaic character printer was classifiable as a computer sub-system under Heading 84.51/55(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and entitled to assessment at the concessional rate under Notification No. 272/76-Cus., or whether its telecommunication application justified the assessment made by the lower authorities.
Analysis: The imported machine was accepted to be a printer, but the material before the Tribunal showed that it was also suitable for telecommunication printing applications. The catalogue described it as fit for use as an electronic digital computer output or a telecommunication printing device, and the accompanying technical literature referred to applications with teletypes and teleinformatics. The scientific officer's letter did not answer the telecommunication question, and the reference to 5 ms in the literature was treated as a signal timing reference, not a physical distance. On that basis, the Tribunal held that the machine had telecommunication application and that the lower authorities were not wrong in their assessment.
Conclusion: The importers failed to establish that the goods were only a computer sub-system; the assessment made by the lower authorities was upheld.