Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the split import licence for restricted goods was validly available to the appellants for the full permissible value and, consequently, whether the order of confiscation was sustainable.
Analysis: The licence documents showed that the parent licence had a face value of Rs. 2,07,500/- and that a separate non-transferable licence for Rs. 41,500/- had been issued under the import policy for restricted items, subject to the actual user condition under Schedule V of the Imports (Control) Order, 1955. The endorsement indicated that the split licence was to be read with the parent licence, and the value of Rs. 41,500/- represented 20% of the parent licence value. Since the appellants were actual users and the import was for their own use, the condition attached to the split licence stood complied with, and no further value restriction was warranted.
Conclusion: The confiscation order was unsustainable and the issue was decided in favour of the appellants.