Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the gold dealers' licence issued to the appellant in his individual capacity could be cancelled under Section 50 of the Gold (Control) Act on the basis of an earlier contravention committed by him as a partner of a firm, when no post-licence contravention or false statement in the application was shown.
Analysis: Section 50 permits cancellation only where the licence-holder has made a false or incorrect statement in the application or has contravened the Act, rules, orders, or other relevant law after the licence is issued, renewed, or continued. The record showed that the action relied upon by the department related entirely to the earlier 1979 contravention, which had occurred before the appellant obtained the later licence in his own name. There was no allegation or proof that after issuance of the 1984 licence the appellant committed any contravention warranting cancellation. The earlier penalty related to his capacity as a partner and could not, by itself, justify cancellation of the separate individual licence.
Conclusion: The cancellation order was not sustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A licence under Section 50 of the Gold (Control) Act cannot be cancelled on the basis of pre-licence misconduct of the holder in a different capacity unless the statutory grounds of false statement in the application or post-licence contravention are established.