Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether wrapping paper produced from pulp and used within the factory for wrapping reels and reams of paper manufactured by the assessee was used for further manufacture of paper or paper board so as to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 62/82 dated 21.2.82.
Analysis: The notification exempted paper and paper board produced out of pulp and falling under Item No. 17 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, if used within the factory of production for further manufacture of paper or paper board on which duty was leviable. The wrapping paper was not treated as mere packing in the sense of a separate, unrelated use. The principle applied was that normal minimum packing without which the finished product could not be marketed is incidental or ancillary to completion of the manufactured product. The Tribunal held that this principle extended to the present case, and that wrapping paper used for wrapping the other varieties of paper before clearance from the factory was used in the further manufacture of paper.
Conclusion: The wrapping paper was eligible for exemption under Notification No. 62/82, and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Normal minimum packing necessary to make the manufactured goods marketable is an incidental or ancillary process of manufacture, and material used for such packing can satisfy a notification requiring use within the factory for further manufacture.