Classification of telephone exchange parts in CKD/SKD condition remanded for fresh examination of re-classification and refund claim.

Imported goods claimed as parts of a telephone exchange in CKD/SKD condition were sought to be classified under Heading 85.13 for consequential refund. The appellate authority held that rejection on the ground of non-production of supporting documents was unjustified because the record showed the documents had been referred to, and the factual question of whether the goods constituted a telephone exchange in CKD/SKD condition could not be properly determined on the existing material. The matter was remanded to allow the claim for re-classification and refund to be established on a fresh opportunity.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported goods, claimed to be parts of a telephone exchange in CKD/SKD condition, were liable to be assessed under Heading 85.13 and considered for consequential refund.

Analysis: The appellate authority found that the rejection of the claim on the footing that the appellants had not produced the supporting documents was not justified, since the record showed that the relevant documents had been referred to. It was also noted that the factual question whether the goods constituted a telephone exchange in CKD/SKD condition could not properly be examined at that stage on the available material.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for a fresh opportunity to the appellants to establish their claim for re-classification under Heading 85.13 and for consequential refund.

---