Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the clearances of liquid oxygen gas during 1.4.1982 to 10.6.1982 were covered by the Chapter X procedure and, consequently, entitled to exemption under Notification No. 224/75-C.E. and refund of duty paid.
Analysis: The relevant requirements under Rules 192, 193 and 194 of the Central Excise Rules were examined. The record showed that the buyer held a valid L-6 licence, the bank guarantee had been extended, a C.T.-2 certificate was issued effective from 1.4.1982 and valid up to 31.3.1983, and the disputed clearances fell within that certificate. Transportation under the prescribed procedure was not in dispute, and the maintenance of accounts and filing of returns satisfied the requirements of Rule 194. Since the duty was paid only because of the department's insistence and the refund claim was filed within time, the levy for the disputed period was held to be erroneous.
Conclusion: The Chapter X requirements were held to have been fulfilled, the clearances were held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 224/75-C.E., and the assessee was held entitled to refund of the duty paid.