Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether concessional excise duty under Notifications Nos. 68/76 and 69/76 dated 16-3-1976 was available on supply of white printing paper for the stated educational purpose, and whether the proper officer could enquire into actual utilisation of the paper before granting the concession.
Analysis: The supply was treated as connected with educational purposes on the facts of the case, but the exemption was held to depend on the satisfaction of the proper officer under the notifications. To prevent diversion, misuse, or misutilisation of concessional paper after clearance, the officer was held competent to verify actual use. The view was also taken that the exemption could not be read so broadly as to exclude inquiry into the end use merely because the paper had been allotted under the regulatory order and related governmental directions.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded for verification of actual utilisation, so the exemption claim was not finally accepted on the existing record.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the limited extent that the exemption claim required fresh examination by the adjudicating authority, and the case was sent back for that purpose.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification makes concessional duty subject to the satisfaction of the proper officer, the authority may examine the actual end use of the goods to ensure that the concession is not misused.