Limitation and excise exemption principles: actual receipt starts time, and pumping brine alone does not amount to power in manufacture.

Limitation for a departmental appeal runs from actual receipt of the appellate order by the competent authority, not merely from knowledge of its existence; on that basis, the appeal was treated as within time and no condonation issue arose. In excise exemption analysis, crude sodium sulphate produced during salt manufacture was regarded as manufactured without the aid of power where power was used only to pump brine into pans and no change had yet occurred in the raw material. That use of power was held not to be use in relation to manufacture, so the exemption under Notification No. 179/77 applied.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the appeal was time-barred and whether condonation of delay was necessary; (ii) whether crude sodium sulphate produced in the course of salt manufacture was manufactured without the aid of power and was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 179/77.

Issue (i): whether the appeal was time-barred and whether condonation of delay was necessary

Analysis: The limitation period was held to run from the date on which the appellate order was actually received by the Collector, not merely from the date on which its existence came to his knowledge through a communication. Since the copy of the order was requisitioned and received later, the appeal filed thereafter was treated as within time.

Conclusion: The appeal was held to be in time and no question of condonation of delay arose.

Issue (ii): whether crude sodium sulphate produced in the course of salt manufacture was manufactured without the aid of power and was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 179/77

Analysis: The raw material, namely brine, was merely pumped into the pans, and no change took place in it before reaching the pans. On that reasoning, the use of power for pumping did not amount to use of power in relation to the manufacture of sodium sulphate. The product was therefore treated as manufactured without the aid of power, making the exemption notification applicable.

Conclusion: The crude sodium sulphate was held to be manufactured without the aid of power and exempt from central excise duty under Notification No. 179/77.

Final Conclusion: The departmental appeals failed on both limitation and merits, and the dismissal of the appeal was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of excise exemption, power used only for an antecedent movement of raw material does not constitute use of power in relation to manufacture where no change has yet occurred in the raw material; limitation for departmental appeal runs from actual receipt of the appellate order by the competent authority.

---