Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the hose assembly of vulcanised, unhardened rubber was classifiable under Heading 40.09 and sub-heading 4009.92 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, or as parts of machinery under Heading 84.31 or 84.66, and whether Interpretative Rule 3(a) or Rule 3(c) applied.
Analysis: The hose assembly was held to be a hose pipe with fittings whose essential character remained that of a hose designed to convey air, gas or liquid. Its cutting to size, skiving, fitting, swaging and testing did not alter the nature of the product. The scope of Heading 40.09 was reinforced by the exclusion in Chapter Note 2 only for hardened rubber parts of mechanical and electrical appliances, and by the Explanatory Notes stating that the heading covers tubing of vulcanised rubber whether or not cut to length. Since the goods were more specifically covered by Heading 40.09, Rule 3(a) governed the classification and Rule 3(c) had no application.
Conclusion: The hose assembly was correctly classifiable under sub-heading 4009.92 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and not under Heading 84.31 or 84.66.