Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether de-oiled rice bran extraction, sesame seed extraction, rape seed extraction, rape-seed extraction and tapioca chips were animal feed liable to duty under Heading 21-CTA.
Analysis: The products under appeal were examined against dictionary meaning, trade understanding, Indian Standard specifications, and earlier decisions on animal feed. The materials showed that the oilcakes and de-oiled rice bran were not complete animal feed but only ingredients or supplements used in compounded feed, mainly as protein supplements. The solvent-extracted products were also not shown to have been treated to remove residual solvent so as to make them fit for animal consumption. As to tapioca chips, earlier decisions had already held that they were not animal feed.
Conclusion: The products were not animal feed and were not liable to duty under Heading 21-CTA.
Final Conclusion: The departmental appeals failed, and the Collector (Appeals) was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods that function only as feed ingredients or supplements, and not as complete animal feed in common parlance, do not fall within the tariff description of animal feed.