Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cast iron rolls, after fettling and machining, remained classifiable under Tariff Item 26AA or became separately dutiable under Tariff Item 68.
Analysis: The rolls were not confined to mere fettling or removal of excess metal. The record showed that after being shaken out, the castings were put on machines for machining and were described as completely or finish machined. Once the goods acquired a distinct identity beyond mere castings, the manufacture was treated as complete. The fact that further processing might be carried out by the customer did not prevent duty liability at the stage of clearance. On the evidence, the goods had gone beyond the stage of castings and were marketable as semi-finished machine parts, which are covered by the residuary tariff entry when not specified elsewhere.
Conclusion: The goods were held to be separately dutiable under Tariff Item 68 in addition to their initial character as castings, and the departmental appeal succeeded.