Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appeal lay to the Appellate Tribunal against the Collector (Appeals) order when the imported goods were baggage and the Tribunal's jurisdiction stood excluded.
Analysis: The appeal concerned goods claimed by the appellant to have been imported as baggage. Section 40 of the Finance Act, 1984 took away the Appellate Tribunal's jurisdiction in respect of orders under clause (b) of Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962 where the order related to goods imported or exported as baggage. In view of the admitted character of the goods as baggage, the statutory bar operated directly against maintainability before the Tribunal. The request to transfer the matter to the revisional authority was also declined, as the Customs Act did not provide for such transfer.
Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable before the Tribunal and the request for transfer was rejected.