Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether empire cloth manufactured by impregnation/coating of textile fabric is classifiable under Heading 5906 as impregnated textile fabrics or under Heading 8546 as electrical insulators.
Analysis: The goods were found to answer the description of impregnated or coated textile fabrics and were not specifically excluded from Chapter 59. Heading 5906 specifically covers textile fabrics that are impregnated, coated or covered, whereas Heading 8546 applies to electrical insulators. The majority view treated Heading 8546 as covering ready-to-use insulators and held that the goods, in their removed form, retained the essential character of impregnated fabrics. The competing heading for insulators was therefore held not to govern classification on the facts.
Conclusion: The goods are classifiable under Heading 5906, and the view classifying them under Heading 8546 was rejected.
Final Conclusion: By majority, the appeal succeeded and the classification under Heading 5906 was restored.
Ratio Decidendi: Where textile fabric is impregnated or coated and retains the essential character of an impregnated fabric, it is classifiable under the specific textile heading rather than as an electrical insulator unless it is a ready-to-use insulator falling squarely within the insulator heading.
Dissenting Opinion: One member held that the more specific description, for the purposes of the article's actual use as insulation, was electrical insulators, and that the product had acquired the essential character of an insulator under Rule 2(a); on that view, Heading 8546 applied and the appeal should have been dismissed.