Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the steel products known as pattis or pattas were classifiable as strips under Item 25(12) of the Central Excise Tariff or as pieces roughly shaped by rolling or forging of iron or steel under Item 25(8), and whether the absence of coiling and the short straight length of the goods excluded them from classification as strips.
Analysis: The definition of strips in the tariff contemplated hot or cold rolled products in rectangular cross-section, supplied in coil or flattened coil form, with the reference to straight length being only an accompanying qualification of flattened coil form and not an independent description. The products in question were accepted to be short straight lengths, never subjected to coiling, and were recognised as pattis by the departmental exemption notification. The adjudicating authorities erred in treating straight length goods as strips merely because their dimensions might otherwise resemble strip products. At the same time, the record lacked the necessary measurements, especially width, to determine the true shape and proportional surface characteristics of the goods for proper classification.
Conclusion: The goods could not be finally classified as strips on the existing record, and the matter had to be sent back for fresh determination with full dimensional details.