Break-up value of shares must reflect actual net assets, not statutory net wealth; income-tax arrears stay non-deductible.

Section 2(m)(iii) of the Wealth-tax Act could not be tested on vires in a reference of this kind, so the constitutional challenge failed. Income-tax arrears under certificate proceedings remained tax liabilities and were not deductible in computing net wealth. For share valuation on a break-up basis, the company's assessed net wealth under the Wealth-tax Act could not replace its actual net assets, because break-up value depends on physical assets less current liabilities and prior charge capital. On that test, deductions for goodwill, leasehold property, bad and doubtful debts, certificate debt and provision for taxation were allowable, while proposed dividends were not.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the constitutional validity of section 2(m)(iii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 could be examined in this reference; (ii) whether arrears of income-tax under certificate proceedings were deductible in computing net wealth under section 2(m)(iii); (iii) whether, for determining the break-up value of shares, the Tribunal was justified in adopting the company's net wealth as assessed under the Wealth-tax Act as its net assets; and (iv) whether the specified deductions in computing the net assets of the company were allowable.

Issue (i): Whether the constitutional validity of section 2(m)(iii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 could be examined in this reference

Analysis: The reference jurisdiction under the Wealth-tax Act was treated as analogous to other advisory tax references, in which questions of vires were held not to be examinable. The court therefore declined to enter upon the constitutional challenge.

Conclusion: The question of vires was not entertainable in this reference and was answered against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether arrears of income-tax under certificate proceedings were deductible in computing net wealth under section 2(m)(iii)

Analysis: The court followed the earlier binding view that income-tax demand does not cease to be tax merely because recovery is being pursued through certificate proceedings under the public demands recovery machinery. The statutory exclusion continued to apply, so the amount remained outside deductible debts in the computation of net wealth.

Conclusion: The arrears of income-tax were not deductible and the issue was answered against the assessee.

Issue (iii): Whether, for determining the break-up value of shares, the Tribunal was justified in adopting the company's net wealth as assessed under the Wealth-tax Act as its net assets

Analysis: Break-up value was held to mean the value of a company's physical assets less current liabilities and prior charge capital. The statutory concept of net wealth under the Wealth-tax Act was an artificial one, affected by exclusions, exemptions, and special computation rules, and therefore could not be treated as a safe or sound basis for market valuation of shares in a going concern.

Conclusion: The Tribunal was not justified in adopting assessed net wealth as the net assets of the company, and the issue was answered against the assessee.

Issue (iv): Whether the specified deductions in computing the net assets of the company were allowable

Analysis: On the proper test for break-up value, deductions for goodwill, leasehold property, bad and doubtful debts, the certificate debt, and provision for taxation were allowable. Proposed dividends were not an allowable deduction for this purpose.

Conclusion: Deductions were allowable for items (i) to (v), but not for item (vi), and this issue was answered partly in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The reference was disposed of by rejecting the constitutional and valuation challenges on the principal issues, while allowing only the specified deductions in the computation of the company's net assets for share valuation.

Ratio Decidendi: For valuation of shares on a break-up basis, the statutory net wealth computed under the Wealth-tax Act cannot substitute the company's actual net assets, which must be determined by taking physical assets and deducting current liabilities and prior charge capital; recovery proceedings do not alter the character of an income-tax arrear for purposes of statutory deduction.

---