Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether untrimmed hardboard lying in stock before the levy on hardboard became liable to excise duty merely because trimming was done after the levy.
Analysis: The applicable test was whether the goods were already manufactured and commercially marketable before the levy, or whether trimming was a necessary, incidental or ancillary process for completion of the excisable product. The Tribunal followed the principle that a product is liable once it has emerged as a commercially known and marketable commodity, even if some further finishing process is done later. The Department produced no evidence to rebut the assessee's material showing that untrimmed hardboard was being marketed as such and was in deliverable condition before the levy.
Conclusion: Untrimmed hardboard in pre-levy stock was not liable to the new excise levy, and the assessee succeeded.