Estate duty on gifted partnership interest turns on exclusion of donor from benefit, not physical possession of firm assets.

Gifted capital introduced into a partnership was not includible in the deceased's estate where the gifts were genuine and complete. The Court explained that, for section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, possession and enjoyment are not judged by physical control of specific partnership assets; the relevant test is whether the donees retained the gifted property to the entire exclusion of the donor and any benefit to him. Any alleged benefit must arise from the gift itself, not merely from the donor's separate retained partnership interest. On that basis, section 10 did not apply and the gifted sum was excluded from the estate computation.

---

---

Issues: Whether the sum representing the gifted capital introduced into the partnership was includible in the computation of the deceased's estate under section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953.

Analysis: The gifts were held to be genuine and complete. The property gifted consisted of interests in an existing partnership, and after the gifts the donees received the profits attributable to their shares. The Court held that in such a case the possession and enjoyment contemplated by section 10 are not to be tested by physical possession of specific assets of the firm, and that the relevant inquiry is whether the donees retained the gifted property to the entire exclusion of the donor or any benefit to him. The Court further held that the benefit, if any, must be referable to the gift itself and not merely to the donor's own retained interest in the partnership.

Conclusion: The sum of Rs. 73,695 was not includible in the computation of the estate of the deceased, and section 10 did not apply.

---