Limitation and show cause notice requirements defeat a demand to recover rebate treated as refund of duty.

A demand to recover rebate already sanctioned and credited was treated as a claim for refund of duty and held time-barred under the Central Excise limitation provisions because it was raised after a long interval. The proceedings were also found defective because they were initiated straightaway by a demand document without a show cause notice. The plea of suppression of facts failed since the exports were not clandestine, had taken place under departmental supervision, and were supported by prescribed documentation. On these grounds, the department's appeal failed and the setting aside of the demand was sustained.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the demand for recovery of the amount was barred by limitation under the Central Excise Rules; (ii) whether the proceedings were vitiated for want of a show cause notice and by the plea of suppression of facts.

Issue (i): Whether the demand for recovery of the amount was barred by limitation under the Central Excise Rules.

Analysis: The amount sought to be recovered was treated as rebate already sanctioned and credited. The challenge to limitation was upheld because the demand was raised after a long interval, and the nature of the rebate was recognised as a refund of duty for purposes of the limitation provisions.

Conclusion: The demand was barred by limitation and the finding of the Collector (Appeals) was correct.

Issue (ii): Whether the proceedings were vitiated for want of a show cause notice and by the plea of suppression of facts.

Analysis: The proceedings were initiated straightaway by a demand document without issuing a show cause notice. The plea of suppression was also rejected because the exports were not clandestine and had taken place under departmental supervision and prescribed documentation.

Conclusion: The proceedings were vitiated for want of a show cause notice, and suppression of facts was not established.

Final Conclusion: The department's appeal failed, and the order setting aside the demand was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: A demand for recovery of rebate treated as refund of duty cannot be sustained when it is issued beyond the applicable limitation period, and suppression cannot be presumed where the underlying export activity was within departmental knowledge and no show cause notice was issued.

---