Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cotton fabrics subjected to calendering and shearing remained grey fabrics or became processed fabrics for the purpose of Notification No. 80/76 and Rule 49A, and whether differential interest at 3% of the yarn duty was payable.
Analysis: Calendering and cropping (shearing) are recognised finishing processes. A fabric cleared after such processing is not treated as grey or unprocessed merely because it may continue to be known in trade as grey goods. Under Notification No. 80/76, unprocessed cotton fabrics subjected in the same factory to the specified finishing processes lose the benefit of exemption. Rule 49A likewise differentiates between clearance of grey fabrics and fabrics cleared after processing, making 3% interest applicable in the latter case.
Conclusion: The fabrics were processed fabrics and not grey fabrics, and the demand for interest at 3% was justified against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were sustained and the appeals failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Cotton fabrics subjected to specified finishing processes cease to be grey or unprocessed for the purposes of the relevant exemption and duty-deferment scheme, and the higher interest rate applies to clearance after processing.