Minor admitted only to partnership benefits: deed upheld and firm entitled to registration renewal.

A partnership deed admitting minors only to the benefits of partnership was construed as valid for renewal of registration under section 26A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The court read the deed as a whole and applied the principle that a minor cannot be made a full partner. Clauses about capital contribution, inspection and signing of accounts, and operation of bank accounts did not, on proper construction, convert the minors into partners; they were capable of being read as acts through guardians or as referring to competent adult partners. The clause excluding the minors from liability for losses was decisive and confirmed that they were not personally liable as full partners, so the firm was entitled to renewal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee-firm was entitled to renewal of registration under section 26A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, on the basis of a partnership deed in which minors were admitted to the benefits of partnership.

Analysis: The deed had to be read as a whole and construed reasonably in the light of the governing principles laid down by the Supreme Court. A minor can be admitted only to the benefits of partnership and cannot be made a full partner. Clauses requiring contribution of capital, inspection and signing of accounts, or operation of bank accounts did not, on a proper construction, convert the minors into full partners. Those clauses were capable of being understood as acts to be done by the guardians on behalf of the minors or as referring only to the major partners who were competent to contract. The decisive clause excluded the minors from liability for losses and showed that they were not personally liable in the manner of full partners.

Conclusion: The deed validly admitted the minors only to the benefits of partnership, and the firm was entitled to renewal of registration.

---