Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether printed cartons and boxes manufactured when exempt from duty but cleared after a budgetary change became liable to central excise duty on the date of clearance.
Analysis: The goods were manufactured before the budget for 1982-83, when they fell under Tariff Item 68 and were exempt under Notification No. 122/75-C.E., but were cleared later after being brought under Tariff Item 174. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision that pre-budget stock manufactured during the period of exemption does not attract duty merely because the goods are cleared after the tariff change. The rule applied was that the prior exemption at the time of manufacture governs liability for such stock.
Conclusion: The goods were not liable to duty, and the appeal succeeded in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Pre-budget stock manufactured when exempt from duty does not become liable merely because it is cleared after a subsequent budgetary change in tariff classification.