Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cost of wooden boxes used for packing machine parts for out-station deliveries was includible in the assessable value under Notification No. 120/75-C.E. and Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.
Analysis: The wooden box was used only for safe transportation during long-distance delivery, while local sales were made in polythene bags alone. The goods were metal machine parts, not delicate or fragile articles, and were capable of being marketed without wooden-box packing. The cost of such packing was therefore treated as a transportation-related expense and not part of the assessable value. The same deductions admissible from the gross sale price under Section 4 were held applicable while determining value under the exemption notification as well.
Conclusion: The cost of the wooden box was not includible in the assessable value, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeals failed and the cross objection did not survive, leaving the order in favour of the assessee undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Packing cost incurred only for safe transportation of goods and not for making them marketable is not includible in assessable value, and the same principle applies while computing value under the exemption notification.