Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Notification No. 227/86-C.E. dated 3-4-1986, given retrospective effect by Section 2 of the Central Duties of Excise (Retrospective Exemption) Act, 1986, applied to goods manufactured for captive consumption and entitled the assessee to exemption from duty.
Analysis: The assessee had been enjoying exemption under Notification No. 118/75-C.E. for wooden crates and cases used captively in the manufacture of glass and glassware. After rescission of that notification, the goods would otherwise have attracted duty for the interregnum before Notification No. 227/86-C.E. came into force. The retrospective exemption statute expressly deemed such notifications to have effect from 1-3-1986 for goods covered by them. The wider scope of the later notification, which also extended to goods cleared for home consumption, did not detract from its applicability to goods used for captive consumption. The statutory deeming provision cured the gap and preserved the exemption for the assessee's goods.
Conclusion: The retrospective exemption under Notification No. 227/86-C.E. applied to the assessee's captively consumed goods, and the demand of duty and penalty could not stand.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a later exemption notification is expressly given retrospective effect by statute, the exemption applies to goods falling within its coverage notwithstanding a wider scope of the notification, provided the goods were otherwise eligible for exemption.