Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of goods exempted under a notification is to be included while computing the aggregate value of clearances for the purpose of Notification No. 80/80, as amended by Notification No. 73/81, and whether such exempted goods cease to be excisable goods.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that the reasoning drawn from sales tax cases dealing with "taxable goods" under a different statutory scheme could not control the meaning of "excisable goods" under the central excise law. It accepted the view expressed by several High Courts that exemption from duty does not alter the character of goods as excisable goods. Relying on the scheme of central excise and the nature of exemption under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, the Tribunal concluded that goods exempted from duty remain excisable goods and their value must be taken into account for determining eligibility under the notification.
Conclusion: The inclusion of the value of exempted goods in the aggregate clearances for 1980-81 was held to be correct in law, and the appeal was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to exclusion of exempted goods from the clearance threshold under the relevant exemption notification, and the duty demand was sustained.