TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether non-execution of a bond at the time of importation barred the assessee from claiming the concessional rate of duty and refund under Notification No. 116/80-Cus. when the goods were subsequently shown to have been used for the specified end-use.
Analysis: The notification granted concessional duty for imports meant for manufacture of specified electronic goods and required a bond to secure payment of the differential duty if end-use was not established. The assessee had paid the normal rate at import and later produced an end-use certificate showing use of the goods for the specified purpose. The absence of a bond at the time of import was treated as not fatal to the claim, and the claim was held to be examinable on merits once the Assistant Collector was satisfied about the end-use.
Conclusion: The non-execution of a bond did not defeat the assessee's claim, and the refund/concessional benefit was held admissible subject to verification of the end-use certificate.
Final Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to have the claim considered on merits, with consequential relief contingent upon satisfaction regarding actual use of the imported goods for the notified purpose.
Ratio Decidendi: Where imported goods are later shown to have been used for the notified end-use and the duty was initially paid at the normal rate, absence of a bond at import does not by itself bar the importer from obtaining the notified concession or refund.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
