Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner had any power under Section 84 of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 to review the order of the Deputy Commissioner and direct the filing of an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), and whether the appeal so filed and the appellate order passed thereon were valid.
Analysis: The statutory scheme did not confer any power of review on the Commissioner. The course adopted was not a revision in accordance with the statute, but an impermissible attempt to reopen the Deputy Commissioner's order by directing an appeal against it. In the absence of such power, the departmental appeal itself was incompetent and the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) on that appeal could not stand.
Conclusion: The impugned departmental appeal and the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) were a nullity and non est.