1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Customs Tribunal: Goods Detention Stay Pending Appeal</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Bombay ruled in favor of the applicant, highlighting that Customs authorities should not detain goods when Stay Applications ... Stay/Dispensation of Predeposit of duty The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Bombay involved two applications by the same applicant regarding dispensation of pre-deposit amounts demanded by Customs authorities. The Tribunal observed that Customs authorities were not justified in detaining goods when Stay Applications were pending, as it defeats the purpose of stay provisions and amounts to harassment. The Tribunal emphasized that Customs should refrain from coercive actions during appeal pendency to ensure speedy disposal and prevent dilatory tactics by the applicant. The Department was urged not to take coercive steps during appeal pendency to avoid the need for interim orders by the Tribunal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
